|
Please give your attention to this from GrassTopsUSA. From time to time, we receive opportunities we believe may be of interest to you and we believe this one deserves your attention.
 Here's the question: When it comes to the Elena Kagan nomination, will Senate Republicans roll over and play dead like obedient dogs... or will they grow spines and mount a FILIBUSTER? Yes, we know that sounds rough, but now is not the time to mince words because, only you have the power to make our elected leaders do the right thing and FILIBUSTER the Kagan confirmation. And the time to make it happen... the time to make your voice heard... is right now. |
When it comes to the Elena Kagan nomination, will Senate Republicans roll over and play dead like obedient dogs... or will they grow spines and mount a FILIBUSTER?
Call your senators today and urge them to vote "No" on Elana Kagan’s nomination to the Supreme Court
Obama's Court pick Kagan a dangerous judicial activist
Call your senators today and urge them to vote "No" on Elana Kagan’s nomination to the Supreme Court
June 25, 2010Dear Friend,
Next week, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold hearings on President Obama's nominee to the United States Supreme Court, current Solicitor General Elana Kagan.
Her nomination should be opposed for any number of reasons (sources here - pdf):
- She is a judicial activist, who agrees with former Justice Thurgood Marshall that the Constitution given to us by the Framers was "defective" and that it contained "outdated notions of liberty, justice and equality."
- Her "judicial hero" is former Israeli justice Aharon Barak, who said a judge "may give a statute a new meaning...[t]he statute remains as it was, but its meaning changes, because the court has given it a new meaning that suits new social needs."
- She is anti-military and pro-homosexual. While dean of the Harvard Law School, she kicked military recruiters off campus, in defiance of a federal law which had been upheld by the Supreme Court on a unanimous vote. She said
“Net Neutrality:” Regulating Like It’s 1934
| “Net Neutrality:” Regulating Like It’s 1934 |
 |
 |
|
undefined
undefinedBy Timothy H. Lee
Thursday, June 17 2010 |
A lot has changed since that not-so-halcyon year 1934. So why are the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and “Net Neutrality” advocates attempting to regulate the Internet under laws drafted for the technology of that era? In 1934, World War I was not yet known as “World War I.” A short film featuring The Three Stooges made its debut. The first soap box derby was held. Germany and its quirky mustachioed chancellor Adolf Hitler signed a non-aggression treaty with neighboring Poland, while the young Soviet Union joined the League of Nations. Elvis Presley, Jerry Lee Lewis and Donald Sutherland wouldn’t be born for another year. That cumbersome dinosaur we now know as Social Security did not even exist. Meanwhile, the fledgling Roosevelt Administration, in its first full year in office, expected to make short work |
Should communist Stalin -- who murdered 20 million -- be honored beside American heroes at a new D-Day Memorial?
Posted in:
Pray for God's Blessings and Mercy!,
US Senate - Take Action!,
US Congress - Take Action,
President - Take Action
Should communist Stalin -- who murdered 20 million -- be honored beside American heroes at a new D-Day Memorial?
A panel of the Food and Drug Administration has recommended approval of a new "morning-after" pill that could be dangerous.
Posted in:
Pray for God's Blessings and Mercy!,
National News,
US Senate - Take Action!,
US Congress - Take Action
FDA panel gives ellaOne a thumbs-up
Charlie Butts - OneNewsNow - 6/18/2010 8:50:00 AM
A panel of the Food and Drug Administration has recommended approval of a new "morning-after" pill that could be dangerous.